Home › Forums › What in the World? › In the News › …US declared officially insolvent 3.31.09…
- This topic has 1 voice and 0 replies.
-
AuthorPosts
-
April 9, 2009 at 3:38 pm #6918WillMember
…
DISCLAIMER: Forwarding email from someone else
does not mean that I endorse any of its contentsUnited States’ DECLARATION OF INSOLVENCY
Explained in Simple Language
by
Paul Andrew Mitchell, B.A., M.S.
Private Attorney General, 18 U.S.C. 1964(a)
(March 23, 2009 A.D.)
All Rights Reserved without Prejudice
We have now hyperlinked the DECLARATION OF INSOLVENCY
with Exhibits (see DRAFT #4):http://www.supremelaw.org/cc/fox2/insolvency.htm
(please study all Exhibits for a detailed explanation)The “United States” in Federal law means the Federal Government:
http://www4.law.cornell.edu/uscode/28/1345.html
The Federal Reserve Banks (“FED”) are private municipal corporations,
created by Congress back in 1913:http://www.supremelaw.org/decs/lewis/
When Congress needs to spend more money than it takes in with taxes,
it sells bonds to the FED. The FED buys those bonds with money
which the FED creates out of thin air.Congress must repay the bond principal and interest, and
it liens on the American People to do so, with
NOTICES OF FEDERAL TAX LIEN, NOTICES OF LEVY,
NOTICES OF DEFICIENCY, etc. See subtitle F of the
Internal Revenue Code for all enForcement statutes.We summarized the entire scam in Chapter 8 of “The Federal Zone”:
http://www.supremelaw.org/fedzone11/htm/chapter8.htm
(begin reading at “What gives?”)The United States is now bankrupt, because it cannot repay all
the money loaned to it by the FED and by other countries.Moreover, creating money out of thin air is fraud, and
this scam originated way back in 1913:http://www.supremelaw.org/decs/daly/
So, on behalf of our clients, who are presently seeking bankruptcy
protection in the Eastern District of Washington, I do have authority
to represent the United States as a Private Attorney General:http://www.supremelaw.org/decs/agency/private.attorney.general.htm
The United States will interplead into that bankruptcy case
on March 31, 2009 A.D., formally to declare insolvency AS TO
each and every obligation — e.g. U.S. Bond — which the
Congress “sold” to the FED.Moreover, because FRNs are legally defined as “obligations of the United States”,
that DECLARATION OF INSOLVENCY will also have the legal result of
voiding all FRNs presently in circulation anywhere on planet Earth:All FRNs will need to be recalled systematically, and then destroyed,
after being exchanged — one-for-one — with U.S. Notes that are printed
by the Bureau of Engraving and Printing — withOUT any interest owed or
payable to the FED on those U.S. Notes.The links in the hyperlinked DECLARATION above will take you to
photographs comparing Federal Reserve Notes and United States Notes.
The latter have been called “red dot” currency, because the Treasury seal
is printed in red ink.The recall of FRNs and exchange for U.S. Notes are temporary measures,
en route to returning to Constitutional money:http://www.supremelaw.org/authors/vieira/ (both documents are excellent!)
We do not anticipate that U.S. Notes will need to be recalled too:
once there is enough gold and silver to back U.S. Notes,
Congress can simply enact a Law declaring them redeemable.One of the main reasons for declaring insolvency formally
is the automatic stay authorized by the Federal bankruptcy laws:
no creditor may collect any further principal or interest payments
once a debtor has sought bankruptcy protection from a
U.S. Bankruptcy Court.Thus, the FED and the IRS will be legally barred (prohibited)
from collecting any more principal or interest payments
on any of the “obligations” of the United States which it “owes”
to the Federal Reserve Banks.Moreover, since FRNs are also legally defined as such “obligations”,
the FED and IRS will also be legally estopped from demanding the
return of any more FRNs e.g. to pay Federal income taxes.Federal income taxes are being used to pay interest to the FED;
they do NOT pay for any Federal government services.
See the Report of the Grace Commission, for proof:http://www.supremelaw.org/sls/31answers.htm#Q29
Last but not least, it is already well established that there
is no liability STATUTE for Federal income taxes imposed
by subtitle A of the Internal Revenue Code:http://www.supremelaw.org/letters/irs.estopped.htm
And, the U.S. Supreme Court has already ruled that a tax liability
may NOT be created by Regulations published in the Federal Register
(again, see links in the DECLARATION above, and below):http://www.supremelaw.org/sls/2amjur2d.htm
http://www.supremelaw.org/sls/2amjur2d.gifThe obvious conclusion, then, is that income taxes imposed by
subtitle A of the Internal Revenue Code are fraudulent to the core,
because there is no Statute at Large (Act of Congress) creating
any specific liability for any of those “taxes”:http://www.supremelaw.org/fedzone11/ (see Preface re: 2 court hearings)
In summary, both the FED and the IRS will be legally “out of business”
throughout the United States of America and throughout all Federal enclaves,
territories and possessions as of midnight ending March 31, 2009 A.D.p.s. There is much additional (and free) reading
at the links below my name here …http://www.supremelaw.org/reading.list.htm
Sincerely yours,
/s/ Paul Andrew Mitchell, B.A., M.S.
Private Attorney General, 18 U.S.C. 1964(a)
http://www.supremelaw.org/decs/agency/private.attorney.general.htm
Criminal Investigator and Federal Witness: 18 U.S.C. 1510, 1512-13
http://www.supremelaw.org/reading.list.htm
http://www.supremelaw.org/index.htm (Home Page)
http://www.supremelaw.org/support.policy.htm (Support Policy)
http://www.supremelaw.org/guidelines.htm (Client Guidelines)
http://www.supremelaw.org/support.guidelines.htm (Policy + Guidelines)All Rights Reserved without Prejudice
Our condensed list of IRS outreach resources:
http://www.supremelaw.org/sls/nutshell.htm <-- START HERE
http://www.supremelaw.org/letters/irs.estopped.htm
http://www.supremelaw.org/end.times.irs.forward.htm
http://www.supremelaw.org/letters/irs.perjury.jurats.htm
http://www.supremelaw.org/psta.analysis.htm
http://www.supremelaw.org/lien.or.levy.htm
http://www.supremelaw.org/notice.of.deficiency.htm
http://www.supremelaw.org/end.times.irs.cclists.htm
http://www.supremelaw.org/support.guidelines.htmDISCLAIMER: Forwarding email from someone else
does not mean that I endorse any of its contents -
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.