Re: Re: Questions for Zingdad and Friends

[Bigfeet E]

Hello again Zing & everybody still visiting here ! 😉

First i’d like to say waw to your acomplishments with the whole housebuilding-and-turning-around-your-life bussiness.
That’s hats off in my view. I can appreciate hard work for what it’s worth. Admiration …
Liked the pictures you posted on y’r blog, and 1 catched my eye where you are standing in the late evening watering your crops.
The sweatshirt or t-shirt you’re wearing has a sweatstain in the form of a heart.
I found it very applicable in the whole scene of giving yourself on the job totally … made me laugh. 😆

Now i’ve bin thinking about what would be a good question to ask regarding the info given in the ascension papers.
Usually they come to me during my own travels of investigating all concepts, and now i can’t seem to remember any of them (typical)
I believe its because i have a habbit to let it loose as quickly that grabbed it, in order not the get stuck and make it an issue.

… contemplating …

Ok, here’s one:
I was wondering, on regard of the dimensions part, if we individually evolute (or is it involute) from 3d to fourth & fifth & so on in a kind of lineair fashion, as in that you can not ‘skipp’ one because
they all need to be experienced before you can level up? I realise this maybe a question that has no simple answer, as the density part has not bin toppled yet, and wich i’m sure it’s totally interwoven
with the dimension part back & forth & in any way i can not even come to imagine. The reason i ask this lies in an underlying question wich involves trying to wrap my mind around the actual ascension
of the individual part and of the earth part and for the whole solarsystem for that matter. (and even larger maybe ?)

Some ppl present for example that earth would ‘shed it’s skin’ literaly and become a star. They ground it with pretty good arguments . They speak of going from 3d to 5d, wherein 3 & 4d would collaps…)
Although plausible i feel this is not entirely correct, more like ascension works more on the perceptional manner, also on a cellular level and doesn’t include a destruction or collaps on the material (& astral)plain in totallity.
Then again, i don’t really know … haha. Maybe i should re read the ‘papers’ again. Every time i do the image changes and with every new piece i find in other sources the global picture becomes more confusing.

The net is buzzing of all kinds of interpretations & theories around the happening and makes it hard to shift. Much of these perceptions start offcourse from our current level of dimension & density.
Also i try to puzzle these within my own experiences & learnings involving the inner rising proces of Kundalini in the most spontaneous way.
I’d love to hear a perspective how this fits the ascension process in any way possible. I find it most workable in my own process, but still haven’t got the full feel of it, sorta speak.

Finally in the end i know i have to live it on my own and mentally i rush to far for the rest of me to follow.
And usually i feel ending up with to little to grasp that helps me in the sence that i’m progressing.
Probably i’m being somewhat frustrated with impatience in that matter.

The question(s) are open to whomever likes answering. From channeled to non-channeled i mean.
Thank you for listening anyway !

Warm Greets,
Erik. 😉